DHA Case No. CWA 195974 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 6, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The Department must ensure the health and safety of IRIS participants. The IRIS policy manual allows involuntary disenrollment for “health and safety risks that participants are unable or unwilling to resolve.” In this case, the petitioner refused […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 194293 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 6, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The amount a community spouse can keep depends on the couple’s total resources on the date of the asset assessment, which is often the date a functional screen was completed and the person was determined functionally eligible. […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 196806 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 9, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An applicant must be under the asset limit as of the last day of the month for that month’s eligibility. In this case, the petitioner’s eligibility for August was denied because her bank statement showed a high […] Read more

DHA Case No. MAP 196477 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 13, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be eligible for the MAPP program, the individual’s countable assets must be below $15,000. Assets titled solely in a spouse’s name do not count for MAPP. In this case, the Department disenrolled the petitioner, apparently counting […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 197060 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 10, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An individual is functionally eligible for Family Care if he or she needs a “nursing home” level of care, as determined by the functional screen. This level of care includes those who cannot safely or appropriately perform […] Read more

DHA Case No. MOP 197486 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 27, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To establish an overpayment, the Department has the burden of proof by the preponderance of the evidence. In this case, the issue was whether the petitioner’s husband lived with her or not (if so, her household income […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 197380 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 2, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, a Medicaid application must be processed within 30 days (plus 10 days if needed to provide verification) and the applicant has the burden of providing the needed verification. This case, however, was “highly unusual” for […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 197359 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 4, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A community spouse must sign the Medicaid application and verify his or her assets unless a denial would result in undue hardship. In this case, the petitioner moved to a separate home from his wife in the […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 197394 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 9, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Benefits cannot be denied for lack of verification unless the member had adequate notice and the ability to produce the required verification. In this case, the petitioner, an incapacitated woman with dementia, moved to a CBRF. The […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 197888 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 20, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, applicants are responsible for verification—but agencies cannot deny eligibility when the applicant has no ability to get the required verification. In this case, the petitioner listed an old timeshare on the Medicaid application but lacked […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 198010 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 27, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When a member disenrolls from a managed long-term care program, DHS’s policy is to automatically test for eligibility for non-waivers programs. In this case, the petitioner voluntarily disenrolled from Family Care after moving to a nursing home […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 208717 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 20, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The Medicaid Eligibility Handbook contains two competing rules: revocable annuities are countable and available assets, but IRAs belonging to a community spouse are disregarded. In this case, the community spouse owned two Individual Retirement Annuities. The agency argued these […] Read more

DHA Case No. MQB 170244 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 8, 2016) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, an irrevocable trust established by either spouse is a countable, available asset if there are any circumstances under which the applicant could receive money from the trust. But this policy does not apply to a […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 197217 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 21, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The usual maximum for the Community Spouse Income Allocation (CSIA) can be increased by an ALJ if needed to pay for “necessary and basic” expenses. In this case, ALJ John Tedesco increased the CSIA to $4,078, largely […] Read more