5.05 Home and Community-Based Waivers Long-Term Care

DHA Case No. MED 36/47216 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 24, 2001) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Wisconsin’s spousal impoverishment law provides that the income of an institutionalized spouse (including a participant in Community Waivers) is not considered available to the community spouse. In this case, DHS had changed its policy so that the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV 40/68902 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 18, 2005) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An institutionalized person may transfer homestead property to their child if the child lived with them and provided care keeping them out of an institution for at least two years immediately before becoming institutionalized. In this case, […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 210387 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 12, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, BadgerCare Plus counts all taxable income. However, the IRS allows some live-in care providers to list all payments as a business expense; in those circumstances, BadgerCare Plus also does not count these payments as income. […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 209367 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 4, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Community Waivers enrollment can be backdated if agency error causes unreasonable delay. In this complicated case, the petitioner was first enrolled in IRIS during the pandemic as a 17- or 18-year-old under his mother’s name. His mother […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 210997 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 17, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF It is the guardian’s responsibility to complete a Medicaid renewal and to keep DHS informed when circumstances change. In this case, the petitioner changed guardians but neither guardian informed the agency, which then sent the renewal notices […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 211106 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 23, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An individual is functionally eligible for Family Care if he or she needs a “nursing home” level of care, as determined by the functional screen—but occasionally the screening program is wrong. In this case, the petitioner used […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 210267 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 25, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Supportive Home Care (SHC) can be a benefit provided through Family Care when the member needs assistance with chores. In this case, Inclusa sought to end the petitioner’s SHC, claiming vaguely that “petitioner may be able to […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 210269 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 26, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Non-medical transportation can be a benefit provided through Family Care when the member needs assistance with transportation. In this case, Inclusa sought to end the petitioner’s non-medical transportation, claiming vaguely that “petitioner may be able to walk […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 211038 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 31, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When an MCO seeks to reduce a member’s supportive home care budget, it has the burden of proof. In this case, the petitioner’s MCO sought to reduce his budget because his son reported some minor improvements. ALJ […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206451 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 30, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A medically necessary service must not be duplicative of other services already being provided. In this case, the petitioner had been in a program for 14 years that allowed him to participate in 3 community events every […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206397 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 17, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care generally does not cover household repairs or improvements that are not directly related to the member’s care. In this case, the petitioner’s carpet was fouled and beyond cleaning, so she asked her MCO to replace […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 210973 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 16, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment can be backdated if agency error by the ADRC or IM causes unreasonable delay. In this case, the petitioner’s authorized representative failed to complete his renewal: she “apparently left employment with her payee company, […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 209929 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 12, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment can be backdated if agency error by the ADRC or IM causes unreasonable delay. In this case, the ADRC sent the Community Waivers referral to IM on June 16, but “for reasons unclear” IM […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 209925 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 12, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment can be backdated if agency error by the ADRC or IM causes unreasonable delay. In this case, the petitioner was eligibile on July 6 but not enrolled until July 21 because the ADRC mistakenly […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 209869 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 12, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, the ADRC has 30 days from the date of request to determine functional eligibility or provide notice of a delay; IM has 30 days from the date of application to determine financial eligibility. In this […] Read more