DHA Case No. FCP 209037 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 14, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The Department may backdate Family Care enrollment when there is an agency error that causes an unreasonable delay. In this case, the petitioner was found eligible in December of 2022 and the MCO received her enrollment form […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 209343 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals October 2, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The balance of a land contract is counted as an available asset unless its terms prohibit transfer or no one is willing to purchase it. In this case, the petitioner was selling non-homestead real estate under a […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 207790 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 19, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In the Family Care program, the MCO must develop an Individual Service Plan (ISP) that reasonably and effectively addresses long-term care needs and outcomes and is cost-effective. In this case, the petitioner had extreme and violent behaviors […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 209188 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals September 5, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An appeal of a negative MA decision must be filed, at most, within 90 days (for most decisions it’s 45 days). In this case, the petitioner’s cost share was increased by notices effective September 1, 2022 and […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 210503 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals December 19, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF After enrollment in a long-term care Medicaid program, the institutionalized spouse must spend down or transfer resources to the community spouse to get below $2,000 by the first renewal. In this case, the petitioner failed to do […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 210574 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 30, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An MCO must give ten days’ notice of any adverse benefit determination. In this case, the petitioner’s MCO issued a notice on September 29 disenrolling her retroactive to August 21. ALJ Brian Schneider concluded the MCO had not […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 208334 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 3, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An ALJ may propose that Family Care enrollment be backdated only if the enrollment date was unnecessarily delayed by the ADRC or IM. In this case, the petitioner applied December 29, 2022 and the agency inaccurately processed […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 192893 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 5, 2019) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An ALJ may issue a proposed decision asking the DHS Secretary to backdate enrollment in Family Care if the normal enrollment date was unnecessarily delayed by either the ADRC or Income Maintenance. In this case, both the […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 207387 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 30, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF An ALJ may issue a proposed decision asking the DHS Secretary to backdate enrollment in Family Care if the normal enrollment date was unnecessarily delayed by either the ADRC or Income Maintenance. In this case, both the […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206978 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 7, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In the Family Care program, the MCO must develop an Individual Service Plan (ISP) that reasonably and effectively addresses the enrollee’s long-term care needs and outcomes and is cost-effective. In this case, Community Care ended the petitioner’s […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206782 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 11, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be functionally eligible for Family Care, a person must fall into one of the program’s target groups in addition to needing a nursing home level of care. In this case, the petitioner needed help with one […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 206604 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 5, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care members in Group A (due to eligibility for MAPP, for example) do not have a cost share. In this complex case, the petitioner lost MAPP eligibility when her child turned 18 and her fiscal test […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 203910 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 23, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF If payments to a relative for services exceed 10% of the maximum CSAS, the MEH requires a notarized agreement. In this case, the petitioner had an agreement to pay her daughters $500 per month, but it was […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 189482 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 27, 2019) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be covered under Family Care, a service must be cost-effective. In this case, the MCO denied the petitioner’s request to install an ADA-height elongated toilet in his rented apartment, saying there were less costly alternatives. ALJ […] Read more