Tag: 4 Program Administration

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Mar. 29, 2017) (DHS) (proposed decision on cost motion) ↓ Download PDF A petitioner who wins a contested fair hearing is entitled to costs (including attorney fees) unless the agency was “substantially justified” or special circumstances would make the award unjust. In this case, the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 175523 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals September 27, 2016) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Although medical assistance applicants must verify relevant information, an agency cannot deny benefits if the applicant is incapable of obtaining the verification or needs help getting it. In this case, a prior fair hearing had determined that […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 157892 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 30, 2014) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF County agencies may not over-verify; they may only require the verification needed to determine eligibility. In this case, the agency requested verification of an old family trust that had been depleted and the value of a Wispact […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212224 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 3, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment may be backdated if agency error causes a delay in enrollment. In this case, the ADRC completed the functional screen on October 31 but did not notify IM of the referral until January 10. […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 212813 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 28, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment may be backdated if agency error causes a delay in enrollment. In this case, the agency requested verification of a new funeral trust—which the petitioner had created but not reported during the pandemic—during a […] Read more

DHA Case No. MLL 212171 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 9, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When estate recovery makes a claim, Wisconsin law gives a right to appeal the issues of the value of the property and the extent of the decedent’s interest in it. In this case, the petitioner and the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 213476 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 8, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency must give individuals adequate written notice of verification requests. In this case, the requests “became numerous and internally inconsistent,” confusing the petitioner. ALJ Kenneth Duren concluded the agency failed to follow proper verification procedures […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212695 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 24, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Continuing enrollment in IRIS requires payment of the cost share. In this case, the petitioner had $1,102.50 of unpaid cost share that she argued was discharged in a bankruptcy court order. ALJ Teresa Perez concluded she lacked […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 213356 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 20, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In this very brief—but slightly horrifying—case, Milwaukee Enrollment Services notified the petitioner that she was no longer eligible for Community Waivers because “you have asked us to stop giving you this benefit.” This was an undisputed error. […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212780 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 10, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF When the Department reduces benefits, it has the burden of proof and must at least present a prima facie case for its decision. In this case, the agency reduced services it had previously deemed necessary and appropriate […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 212112 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 7, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF IRIS may pay for a vehicle modification as a one-time expense (OTE) request, but it must be cost-effective and all other options for funding must be exhausted first. In this case, the 20-year-old petitioner requested a $102,000 […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 212166 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 10, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF The county agency must give individuals adequate written notice of verification requests. In this case, the agency sought to verify whether the petitioner was residing with her estranged spouse. The notice, however, only requested verification of “people […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 212098 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 26, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Family Care enrollment can be backdated if agency error by the ADRC or IM causes unreasonable delay. In this case, the petitioner claimed to have sent verification of assets being below $2,000 in December—via ACCESS and, a […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWK 211734 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 26, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To be eligible for the Children’s Long-Term Support program (CLTS), the child must meet an institutional level of care as determined by the program’s specific functional screen. In this case, the agency sought to disenroll the petitioner […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 211741 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals April 17, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Beginning on the date of enrollment, an MCO must pay for needed services, including the continuation of current services “necessary to ensure health and safety and continuity of care,” until the full assessment and member-centered plan are […] Read more