3.1 Income

DHA Case No. BCS 207395 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 28, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF A Notice of Proof Needed must advise the applicant of the specific verification required. In this case, the petitioner received a notice requesting proof of “TUITION: Amount of student loan or grant funds and how they are […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 196854 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 14, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF For EBD Medicaid programs, a couple’s income is only counted together if they are legally married and living together. In this case, the petitioner lived with his partner, had children with her, had a commitment ceremony, and […] Read more

DHA Case No. MOP 197486 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 27, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF To establish an overpayment, the Department has the burden of proof by the preponderance of the evidence. In this case, the issue was whether the petitioner’s husband lived with her or not (if so, her household income […] Read more

DHA Case No. CWA 198273 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals August 3, 2020) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF This brief decision is a straightforward application of the name-on-the-check rule. A Medicaid-compliant annuity that pays only to the community spouse is not income available to the insititutionalized spouse. Preliminary Recitals Pursuant to a petition filed on […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 200475 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 8, 2021) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Eligibility for MA begins the first of the month in which the applicant meets all program requirements. In this case, the petitioner planned for a divestment penalty with a Medicaid-compliant annuity, but the final annuity payment occurred […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 201844 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals July 12, 2021) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In determining patient liability, the Medicaid Eligibility Handbook allows a limited number of deductions from income. In this case, the petitioner could not afford to pay both his patient liability and his bankruptcy settlement. ALJ Kelly Cochrane could find […] Read more

DHA Case No. MGE 203510 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 9, 2022) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF Income is not available if the individual lacks the legal ability to make it available for support and maintenance. In this case, the petitioner was on hospice and totally incapacitated, had no POA or guardian, her marital […] Read more

DHA Case No. BCS 204450 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals March 29, 2022) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF In general, all taxable gross income is counted when determining eligibility for BadgerCare Plus, including Social Security income. In this case, the petitioner deposited his Social Security into an ABLE account. ALJ Beth Whitaker found that the […] Read more

DHA Case No. MPC-13/78330 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 1, 2006) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF In Community Waivers cases, countable income is first used in eligibility determinations to place an applicant into a group; then the post-eligibility cost share is calculated based on the formula for that group. In this case, the petitioner’s […] Read more

DHA Case No. MDV-45/86382 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals November 19, 2007) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF Issue 1: Caretaker child The caretaker child exception allows an institutionalized person to transfer homestead property to a child who lived with the person and provided care for at least two years. In this case, the petitioner co-owned […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 155113 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals May 14, 2014) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF The issue in this case was whether overnight caregiver costs counted as a remedial expense, which could be deducted from income before determining the cost share. The agency argued these could not be a remedial expense, relying […] Read more

DHA Case No. FCP 197076 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 28, 2020) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF In this case, the petitioner had a life estate in two properties, one in California and one in Wisconsin. Both were rented. But Dane County DHS did not reduce the petitioner’s cost share to allow her to pay […] Read more

DHA Case No. MRA 167179 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Dec. 11, 2015) (DHS)  ↓ Download PDF This decision contains the classic “name on the check” rule. If income is paid only to the name of the community spouse, it is not countable as income to the institutionalized spouse—even if the income is from an […] Read more