MPA 207141 (02/24/2023)
IRIS personal care worker hours approved

DHA Case No. MPA 207141 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals February 24, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF

To determine the number of personal care worker (PCW) hours it will approve, the Department uses the Personal Care Screening Tool, which can then be adjusted. In this case, the petitioner, an 81-year-old woman with a history of stroke and dementia, asked for 25 PCW hours per week. The Department reduced this to 15 hours per week, relying on information from a 5-month-old functional screen. ALJ Peter McCombs concluded the petitioner and her daughter had testified credibly at the hearing and met their burden to prove the 25 hours per week were medically necessary.


Have comments, corrections, or feedback? A fair hearing decision that should be published?
✉️ Email feedback.


Get email summaries of new decisions:

Preliminary Recitals

Pursuant to a petition filed on December 10, 2022, under Wis. Stat. § 49.45(5), and Wis. Admin. Code § HA 3.03(1), to review a decision by the Division of Medicaid Services regarding Medical Assistance (MA), a hearing was held on February 8, 2023, by telephone.

The issue for determination is whether the agency correctly modified petitioner’s prior authorization request for Personal Care Worker (PCW) services.

There appeared at that time the following persons:

PARTIES IN INTEREST:

Petitioner:

Respondent:
Department of Health Services
1 West Wilson Street, Room 651
Madison, WI 53703
By: —
Division of Medicaid Services
PO Box 309
Madison, WI 53701-0309

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:
Peter McCombs
Division of Hearings and Appeals

Findings of Fact

  1. Petitioner is an 81-year-old resident of Wood County.
  2. Petitioner’s diagnoses include right hemispheric (cortical) stroke, cerebrovascular accident with left lower extremity hemiparesis, bunion of the right foot, hypertension, and TIA (transient ischemic attack).
  3. On October 12, 2022, the respondent received a prior authorization request form from Universal Home Health Care, submitted on petitioner’s behalf. The petitioner requested 100 units/week of PCW time (25 hours/week or 3.57 hours/day). The requested start date was November 16, 2022.
  4. On November 8, 2022, the agency approved, with modifications, petitioner’s prior authorization request, approving 61 units/week (15.25 hours/week or 2.18 hours/day. The agency approved {CW time for bathing once daily (includes an episode of dressing), a second dressing episode of upper and lower body, grooming twice daily (20 minutes daily), toileting twice per day, bed transfers (15 minutes daily), and time for incidentals. Additionally, 96 PRN units were granted, which are to be used for acute exacerbations of condition(s) and/or to attend medical appointments to assist with ADLs.
  5. The agency modified time requested for grooming, toileting, and transferring, and denied any PCW time pertaining to mobility.
  6. Petitioner timely filed an appeal of the modification to her PCS time request.

Discussion

Personal care services are “medically oriented activities related to assisting a recipient with activities of daily living necessary to maintain the recipient in his or her place of residence in the community.” Wis. Admin. Code §DHS 107.112(1)(a). Covered services include the following:

  1. Assistance with bathing;
  2. Assistance with getting in and out of bed;
  3. Teeth, mouth, denture and hair care;
  4. Assistance with mobility and ambulation including use of walker, cane or crutches;
  5. Changing the recipient’s bed and laundering the bed linens and the recipient’s personal clothing;
  6. Skin care excluding wound care;
  7. Care of eyeglasses and hearing aids;
  8. Assistance with dressing and undressing;
  9. Toileting, including use and care of bedpan, urinal, commode or toilet;
  10. Light cleaning in essential areas of the home used during personal care service activities;
  11. Meal preparation, food purchasing and meal serving;
  12. Simple transfers including bed to chair or wheelchair and reverse; and
  13. Accompanying the recipient to obtain medical diagnosis and treatment.

Wis. Admin. Code, §DHS 107.112(1)(b).

Personal care workers can spend no more than one-third of their time performing housekeeping activities, or one-fourth when the recipient lives with family. Like all medical assistance services, PCW services must be medically necessary, appropriate, and cost effective. Wis. Admin. Code, §DHS 107.02(3)(e)1, 2, and 3. The petitioner has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the requested services meet the approval criteria.

To determine the numbers of PCW hours, providers are required by the Department to use the Personal Care Screening Tool (PCST), a tool meant to consistently determine the number of hours required by each recipient. The screening tool allots a specific amount of time in each area the recipient requires help, which the Department’s reviewer can then adjust to account for variables missing from the screening tool’s calculations.

In this case, the Department ultimately approved all requested PCW time in the PA for bathing and upper and lower dressing. The Department reduced the time requested for grooming, toileting, and transfers. The Department denied the requested time for mobility. It approved time for Incidental matters but at a lower amount then sought as approved direct hours were less than requested. The respondent’s modification relied heavily upon a June 2022 Long Term Care Functional Screen prepared by petitioner’s IRIS provider, which the petitioner argues does not reflect her current status (7 months later), nor her status in November of 2022 (5 months later).

Petitioner and her daughter appeared at hearing. I found their testimony to be credible and reliable. Petitioner has more recently been dealing with dementia, in addition to her worsening physical condition. Petitioner’s daughter noted that her mother is increasingly weak physically, and at present she requires almost constant assistance with all bathing, grooming, mobility and transferring. She further testified that petitioner lives alone, but that there is always someone, presumably unpaid caregivers, with her. Based on the record, I find that petitioner has established that the requested 100 units per week of PCW time are medically necessary.

I note that the Department in prior years had approved PA requests submitted on petitioner’s behalf for PCW time in an amount greater than the Department approved/modified here. See Exhibit 1, Consultant Letter. The Department indicated those approvals only went through a clerical review, which largely only identifies obvious discrepancies. Id. The current PA went through a more intensive clinical review by a nurse consultant. It is the provider’s and petitioner’s burden to submit sufficient evidence to demonstrate medical necessity of the requested PCW time. Based on the record before me, I find that petitioner has established the medical necessity of the PCW time requested, and the agency has not successfully rebutted the petitioner’s arguments, documentation, and testimony.

Note to Petitioner: Your provider will not receive a copy of this Decision. In order to have the PCW service requested here, you must provide a copy of this Decision to Universal Home Health Care. The provider must then submit a new prior authorization request to receive the approved service.

Conclusions of Law

The petitioner requires 100.00 PCW units weekly, effective November 16, 2022 through the end of the current authorization period.

THEREFORE, it is

Ordered

That Universal Home Health Care is hereby authorized to provide the petitioner with 100.00 PCW units weekly for the period beginning November 16, 2022, and to submit its claim, along with a copy of this Decision and a new prior authorization request, to ForwardHealth for payment. In all other respects, the petition is dismissed.

[Request for a rehearing and appeal to court instructions omitted.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *