MPA 207077 (01/27/2023)
PCW hours reduction upheld

DHA Case No. MPA 207077 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals January 27, 2023) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF

Personal care services under Medicaid must be medically necessary and cost-effective. In this case, the petitioner asked for 19.5 Personal Care Worker (PCW) hours per week but was only approved for 10.25. ALJ Brian Schneider upheld the reduction because the medical information and records available did not justify the additional time.


Have comments, corrections, or feedback? A fair hearing decision that should be published?
✉️ Email feedback.


Get summaries of new decisions emailed weekly:
📩 Subscribe to ELW Free

Preliminary Recitals

Pursuant to a petition filed November 28, 2022, under Wis. Stat., §49.45(5), to review a decision by the Division of Medicaid Services (DMS) to modify a Medical Assistance (MA) authorization for personal care worker (PCW) services, a hearing was held on January 25, 2023, by telephone.

The issue for determination is whether the DMS correctly reduced requested PCW time.

PARTIES IN INTEREST:

Petitioner:

Respondent:
Department of Health Services
1 West Wilson Street, Room 651
Madison, WI 53703
By: Written submission of —, RN
Division of Medicaid Services
PO Box 309
Madison, WI 53701-0309

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:
Brian C. Schneider
Division of Hearings and Appeals

Findings of Fact

  1. Petitioner is a 63-year-old resident of Milwaukee County who is eligible for MA.
  2. Petitioner’s principal diagnosis affecting his ability to care for himself is low back pain. He had PCW services of approximately 40 hours per week approved in 2021 and 2022. Those approvals were granted without clinical review by the DMS.
  3. On September 21, 2022, Life Touches Home Healthcare requested prior authorization for 78 units weekly PCW services (78 units is equal to 19.5 hours), PA no. —. This request was pulled for clinical review by a DMS consultant.
  4. The consultant approved requested time for bathing and transfers. Life Touches requested 30 minutes per day for grooming; the consultant approved just 10 minutes per day because the only grooming task mentioned as needing assistance was shaving. Life Touches requested 20 minutes per day for mobility assistance; the consultant denied time for mobility because the a personal care screen done in July, 2022 stated that petitioner was able to move about his residence on his own or with a cane. Finally, Life Touches requested an additional 28 minutes per day for behavioral concerns, noting that petitioner has schizophrenia; the consultant denied the additional time because petitioner’s medical records do not mention schizophrenia and, more importantly, the plan of care signed by his doctor did not mention a need for additional time due to behaviors.
  5. The DMS granted 41 units (10.25 hours) per week PCW time. Petitioner was informed of the modification by a letter dated November 14, 2022. In addition, the approval went only to March 19, 2023 instead of the requested 53 weeks, because the plan of care expires March 19, 2023.

Discussion

Personal care services are “medically oriented activities related to assisting a recipient with activities of daily living necessary to maintain the recipient in his or her place of residence in the community.” Wis. Admin. Code §DHS 107.112(1)(a). Covered services include the following:

  1. Assistance with bathing;
  2. Assistance with getting in and out of bed;
  3. Teeth, mouth, denture and hair care;
  4. Assistance with mobility and ambulation including use of walker, cane or crutches;
  5. Changing the recipient’s bed and laundering the bed linens and the recipient’s personal clothing;
  6. Skin care excluding wound care;
  7. Care of eyeglasses and hearing aids;
  8. Assistance with dressing and undressing;
  9. Toileting, including use and care of bedpan, urinal, commode or toilet;
  10. Light cleaning in essential areas of the home used during personal care service activities;
  11. Meal preparation, food purchasing and meal serving;
  12. Simple transfers including bed to chair or wheelchair and reverse; and
  13. Accompanying the recipient to obtain medical diagnosis and treatment.

Wis. Admin. Code, §DHS 107.112(b).

Personal care workers can spend no more than one-third of their time performing housekeeping activities. Like all medical assistance services, PCW services must be medically necessary and cost effective. Wis. Admin. Code, §DHS 107.02(3)(e)1 and 3.

The DMS utilizes a Personal Care Screening Tool, a computer program it believes will allow it to consistently determine the number of hours required by each recipient. The screening tool allots a specific amount of time in each area the recipient requires help, which the DMS’s reviewer can then adjust to account for variables missing from the screening tool’s calculations. The Department also now uses a Personal Care Activity Time Allocation Table to determine allotted times for PCW tasks, which the DMS follows unless the request explains specifically why additional time is necessary. The Table is found as Attachment 10 to Nurse Consultant —’s January 23, 2023 case summary.

I note first that a major reason for the reduction in PCW time is that, although previously 40 hours per week were granted, in this PA request the provider requested only 19.5 hours per week. I cannot restore petitioner to 40 hours per week because I am limited to approving, at most, the time requested.

Petitioner testified that since the assessment he has had two surgeries, one of which decreased the use of his hand, the other decreasing his mobility. The problem is that I am reviewing the determination based on the submission with the PA request. If petitioner’s capabilities have decreased, the provider must request an amendment with updated medical information. Life Touches has not requested an amendment, so I am unable to make a determination of petitioner’s needs beyond the original submission.

With regard to the original submission, I cannot find fault with the DMS determination. The provider did not explain the need for 30 minutes, rather than the standard 10 minutes, for daily grooming. Although both petitioner and his caretaker testified about his loss of mobility since his surgery, the determination made was correct based upon the information available at the time the DMS determination was made. Finally, petitioner’s recent medical records do not mention schizophrenia, and most importantly, petitioner’s plan of care does not mention a need for more time due to behaviors.

I conclude that the modification of PCW services from 19.5 hours weekly to 10.25 hours weekly was correct. I urge petitioner to discuss a possible amendment with his Life Touches representative, and I note again that the current approval runs only to March 19, 2023, so a new request will have to be made before that date. An amendment or a new request should include updated records of petitioner’s capabilities.

Conclusions of Law

The DMS correctly determined PCW hours to be 10.25 hours per week based upon the records and plan of care submitted by the home health agency.

THEREFORE, it is

Ordered

That the petition for review is hereby dismissed.

[Request for a rehearing and appeal to court instructions omitted.]