MGE 216109 (02/14/2025)
Petitioner ineligible for Community Waivers after losing disability status with SSA

DHA Case No. MGE 216109 (Wis. Div. Hearings and Appeals Feb. 14, 2025) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF

To be eligible for Community Waivers Medicaid programs, an individual must be elderly, blind, or disabled. In this case, the petitioner was 28 years old and working full time at $15.50 per hour, though he had at some point previously been eligible for SSI. The agency sent a notice of disenrollment after an alert through the Social Security Administration data exchange that the petitioner no longer had a current finding of disability. ALJ Teresa Perez concluded the disenrollment was correct.


Have comments, corrections, or feedback? A fair hearing decision that should be published?
✉️ Email feedback.


Get summaries of new decisions emailed weekly:
📩 Subscribe to ELW Free

This decision was published with support from the Wisconsin chapter of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys.

Preliminary Recitals

Pursuant to a petition filed on November 27, 2024, under Wis. Stat. § 49.45(5), Wis. Admin. Code § HA 3.03(1), and Wis. Admin. Code § DHS 10.55, to review a decision by the Milwaukee Enrollment Services that Petitioner is not eligible for Medical Assistance (MA) and to review a decision by MY Choice, a managed care organization contracted by the Department of Health Services, that Petitioner is not eligible to remain enrolled in Family Care, a hearing was held on January 9, 2025, by telephone. Two appeal files were opened in response to Petitioner’s hearing request: one regarding his eligibility for Medical Assistance and the other regarding his disenrollment from the Family Care Program (DHA Case No. FCP-216111); however, the substance of the decisions written under each case number is identical.

The issues for determination are whether the Department of Health Services, through its agents, properly determined: (1) that Petitioner was not eligible for health care benefits through the Community Waivers Program or any other Medical Assistance program as of December 1, 2024, and (2) that Petitioner is not eligible to remain enrolled in Family Care.

There appeared at that time the following persons:

PARTIES IN INTEREST:

Petitioner:

Respondent:
Department of Health Services
1 West Wilson Street, Room 651
Madison, WI 53703
By: Stacy Green, MilES
Milwaukee Enrollment Services
1220 W Vliet St
Milwaukee, WI 53205

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:
Teresa A. Perez
Division of Hearings and Appeals

Findings of Fact

  1. Petitioner (CARES # —) is a 28-year old resident of Milwaukee County who has had an open Community Waivers case since October 2023 and who is currently receiving Family Care benefits through My Choice managed care organization (“MCO”).
  2. In November 2024, Milwaukee Enrollment Services was alerted via a computer data exchange with the Social Security Administration that Petitioner does not have a current finding of disability.
  3. Petitioner is employed and his gross (before taxes) monthly wages are approximately $2,650.
  4. By notice dated November 12, 2024, the agency informed Petitioner that he was not eligible for Community Waivers as of December 1, 2024 because he is not at least 65 years old, blind, or disabled and that he is not eligible for BadgerCare Plus because his income is over the BCP Program limit.
  5. Because Petitioner was found to no longer be eligible for Medical Assistance benefits as of December 1, 2024, he was scheduled for disenrollment from Family Care as of December 1, 2024.
  6. On November 27, 2024, Petitioner filed a request for fair hearing with the Division of Hearings and Appeals and benefits were ordered to be continued pending the outcome of the appeal.

Discussion

Family Care (FC) is a Medical Assistance funded long term care community waiver program intended to meet the long term care and health care needs of frail elders; individuals age 18 and older who have physical disabilities, as defined in Wis. Stat. §15.197 (4) (a) 2.; and individuals age 18 and older who have developmental disabilities, as defined in Wis. Stat. §51.01 (5) (a). Wis. Stat. §46.286(1). To receive Family Care benefits, an individual must not only fall into one of these three target groups but also meet functional eligibility requirements and qualify for a full benefit category of Elderly, Blind, Disabled (EBD) Medicaid (e.g., Community Waivers); BadgerCare Plus; Well Woman Wisconsin Medical Assistance; Adoption Assistance; or Foster Care Medicaid. MEHB §28.1.2; see also, Wis. Stat. §46.286(1)(b).

Milwaukee Enrollment Services (“the agency”) found that Petitioner was no longer eligible for Community Waivers (or any other category of EBD Medicaid) as of December 1, 2024 because it received notification from the Social Security Administration that Petitioner does not have a current finding of disability. The agency correctly noted that to receive Community Waivers, a person must be at least age 65 or have been determined to be blind or disabled. See MEH §4.1, §5.2, and §28.1. Petitioner’s mother, —, who appeared with Petitioner at hearing, testified that her son had previously received SSI based on a finding of disability and that he had never been told that he was no longer considered disabled. However, she acknowledged that his SSI had been terminated in the past because of his work activity and she presented no documentation to refute the Social Security data exchange record offered by the agency.

The agency next screened Petitioner for BadgerCare Plus. Childless adults as well as parents and caretakers of minor children may be eligible to receive BCP if they have income of no more than 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL) for the applicable test group size. BadgerCare Plus Eligibility Handbook (BCPH) §16.1.1. As of February 2024, the income limit for a one-person test group was $1,255 per month (i.e., $15,060 per year). Wis. Stat. § 49.45(23)(a); BCPH § 50.1. That amount increased to $1,304.17 as of February 1, 2025 ($15,650 per year). Id. Individuals may also be found eligible for BCP if their annual income is reasonably expected to be under 100% FPL even if their income in particular months exceeds 100% FPL. See BCPH §16.9.

The agency representative testified that she reviewed paystubs dated September 20, 2024 and October 7, 2024 which showed that Petitioner worked an average of 85.5 hours per pay period and that he earned $15.50 per hour. Petitioner agreed to the accuracy of the wages cited by the agency and did not assert or present evidence to establish that those wages were atypical for him. The agency thus correctly determined that Petitioner’s gross monthly income is approximately $2,650 which is over the current $1,304.17 monthly income limit for BCP.

Because Petitioner was determined to no longer be eligible for a full benefit Medicaid program, MyChoice Family Care, Petitioner’s MCO, correctly now seeks to disenroll Petitioner from Family Care.

Based on the evidence in the hearing record, I find that, as of December 1, 2024, Petitioner is not eligible for Community Waivers, any other category of Elderly, Blind, Disabled Medicaid, or BadgerCare Plus.

Finally, I note that there is a Medicaid program called the Medical Assistance Purchase Plan which allows some disabled people who are working to become or remain Medicaid eligible. See MEHB §26.1. Petitioner can file a Medical Assistance Disability Application at any time to be screened for that program. If he does so, the State will gather medical, work, and educational information, analyze whether he currently meets the legal standard to be considered disabled, and issue an appealable decision.

Conclusions of Law

  1. The agency properly determined that Petitioner was no longer eligible for Community Waivers as of December 1, 2024 because he does not have a current disability finding, is not blind, and is not at least 65 years old.
  2. The agency properly determined that Petitioner’s income exceeds the BCP income limit.
  3. Petitioner is not eligible to remain enrolled in Family Care because he is not currently eligible for any full-benefit Medicaid program.

THEREFORE, it is

Ordered

Petitioner’s appeal is dismissed.

[Request for a rehearing and appeal to court instructions omitted.]

 

If you found this decision useful, sign up for my email newsletter. You’ll get summaries of newly published decisions and a PDF of useful information on estate recovery.