DHA Case No. FCP 213209 (Wis. Div. of Hearings and Appeals June 27, 2024) (DHS) ↓ Download PDF

A Family Care member can be involuntarily disenrolled if they lose or are determined ineligible for MA. In this case, the petitioner was disenrolled when the agency failed to test her for Community Waivers eligibility while processing her renewal. Noting that this case was about an incorrect disenrollment, not backdating, ALJ Jason Grace issued a final decision ordering the agency to restore the petitioner’s Family Care enrollment retroactively.


Have comments, corrections, or feedback? A fair hearing decision that should be published?
✉️ Email feedback.


Get summaries of new decisions emailed weekly:
📩 Subscribe to ELW Free

Preliminary Recitals

Pursuant to a petition filed on April 29, 2024, under Wis. Stat. § 49.45(5)(a), to review a decision by the Milwaukee Enrollment Services regarding Medical Assistance (MA), a hearing was held on June 26, 2024, by telephone.

The issue for determination is whether the petitioner was incorrectly disenrolled from the Family Care program.

There appeared at that time the following persons:

PARTIES IN INTEREST:

Petitioner:

Respondent:
Department of Health Services
1 West Wilson Street, Room 651
Madison, WI 53703
By: Kyra Oberg
Milwaukee Enrollment Services
1220 W Vliet St
Milwaukee, WI 53205

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:
Jason M. Grace
Division of Hearings and Appeals

Findings of Fact

  1. Petitioner (CARES # —) is a resident of Milwaukee County.
  2. As of March 15, 2021, the petitioner was enrolled in the Family Care program (FCP), with My Choice Wisconsin her managed care organization (MCO).
  3. A Long Term Care Functional Screen was completed for the petitioner on or about October 9, 2023. It found that the petitioner met the target groups of Physical Disability and Severe and Persistent Mental Illness, that she had a Nursing-Home level of care, and was functionally eligible for the FCP.
  4. On January 15, 2024, notice was provided to the petitioner that she needed to complete a health care renewal or her benefits would end as of February 29, 2024.
  5. Prior to the February 29, 2024 deadline, the petitioner timely completed her renewal which included providing all requested verification.
  6. In processing the renewal, the income maintenance (IM) agency errored by failing to test the petitioner for Home-Based Community Waiver program. If it had, the petitioner would have been found to still be eligible for FCP as she was functionally and financially eligible. Testimony of agency representative.
  7. Due to agency error, the petitioner was incorrectly disenrolled from FCP as of February 29, 2024. Testimony of agency representative.
  8. The petitioner timely appealed.

Discussion

The Family Care program (FCP) is a MA waiver program that provides appropriate long-term care services for elderly or disabled adults. Wis. Stat. §46.286; see also Wis. Admin. Code, Chapter DHS 10. To be eligible, a person must meet the program’s financial and non-financial criteria, including functional criteria. Wis. Admin. Code, §§DHS 10.32(1)(d) and (e). Once a person meets all the program’s eligibility criteria, she is “entitled to enroll in a care management organization and to receive the family care benefit.” Wis. Admin. Code §DHS 10.36(1).

A FCP participant can be involuntarily disenrolled from the FCP if they lose or are determined ineligible for MA. See Contract Between the Department of Health Services and MCOs, Article IV, Enrollment and Disenrollment, pg. 45, found online at: https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/familycare/mcos/fc-fcp-2024-contract.pdf.

In this case, the petitioner was already enrolled in the FCP. She was disenrolled from the FCP on February 29, 2024 as a result of the processing of her health care renewal. IM acknowledged that the petitioner was incorrectly disenrolled from the FCP due to agency error in processing her February 2024 health care renewal. But for that error, it was indicated that petitioner would have been found to continue to be eligible for FCP and the disenrollment would not have occurred. It was indicated that the petitioner continued to be financially and functionally eligible for the FCP at the time of her health care renewal. The petitioner, IM representative, and MCO representative at hearing all agreed the petitioner’s FCP benefits should be reinstated as of March 1, 2024.

I would note that this case does not deal with backdating FCP following a delayed processing of a new application but the incorrect disenrollment from the FCP due to agency error. Thus, it is issued as a final decision.

Conclusions of Law

Due to agency error, the petitioner was incorrectly disenrolled from the Family Care program.

THEREFORE, it is

Ordered

That this matter be remanded to the IM/MCO with the following instructions: within 10 days of the date of this Decision, take all necessary administrative steps to restore petitioner’s FCP enrollment and authorizations retroactive to March 1, 2024.

[Request for a rehearing and appeal to court instructions omitted.]